The dispute within the ruling coalition has lasted, as this crisis is not a crisis to end by means of a compromise but one to choose between winners and losers. The political crisis is now unrolling, after more than three weeks, in the same parameters with those on the starting point. The combatants are simulating reconciliation gestures but they are not willing to come to a compromise at all. PNL (the National Liberal Party) is pretending to play a drawn game, but each of the party is looking forward to checkmate its enemies as soon as possible. The more they are talking of an armistice the more the war is more savage. The explanation of this crisis lies in that the ongoing conflict between the coalition's partners, unlike the others, is not seen as one to end in a compromise. The crisis has to choose between winners and losers. From this premise the coalition's members are starting at. Otherwise, their plain attacks on both sides can no longer justify. Each day brings into open a new message accompanied by a note covering the previous one. This day accusations are more serious and awful than the yesterday ones. This makes the crisis of the last word uttered. Sides don't seem to give in since the last one who speaks last wins. For the first time in the ongoing coalition's history, PD (the Democratic Party) was caught on a defensive position. It had to account for the crisis, answer accusations, apologize and state its position in a framework imposed by the coalition partners all the time during these tree weeks of crisis. PNL and PNTCD (the National Christian Democratic Peasant Party) to a less great extent, imposed on everything PD has done lately. It was simply doing the part of a second hand actor who does nothing else but reply. Under the fists of its enemies, the democrats had no time to say how skillful ministers they have and how reformist and pragmatic their