Lacking political support, CNSAS has become the Intelligence Service's (SRI) playing toy. Unfortunately, Ticu Dumitrescu was right: the law allowing access to the Secret Service' files (Securitate) is inoperative. One of the law's initiator reasons when denying his paternity over the final shape of the legal act after it had gone through the Parliament was that the archives are still administrated by the same current SRI, SIE, MAE etc. Ticu Dumitrescu asserted that in Germany, the Gauck law was operant just for the reason that STASI archives had passed into the structure's administration employed to study them. The recent protest of the National Council Board for Investigating the Securitate's Archives (CNSAS) against the SRI's chastisement shows that the direct access to archives issue is still crucial. Ordinary files about informers or files supplied by SRI were found missing or counterfeit when members of the Board wished to apply the law of files to candidates running for the mayor's office in the second tour. Problems related to money, to signing collaboration protocols with archive owners or to the difficulty in finding a home office are another significant point to remember. SRI does not only tease the members of the Board but also keep them under its surveillance, as they say. All these can happen in the absence of a real efficient political support. Besides, the "national interest" field is defined by law in such general terms that almost any document can be hidden if SRI decides so. In the case of file law, when referring to the access to archives it is stipulated that only CNSAS must enjoy full access to the files. SRI immediately interpreted the detail: full access does not mean direct access, too. This is the very main problem, which holds back the signing of the collaboration protocol with SRI. Costin Georgescu wishes that CNSAS to be entitled to reques