Criticising the anticommunist-like discourse-is a new political strategy enjoying success. But when was the anti-communism a serious matter in Romania? The anticommunist discourse no longer exists. Many of the public life actors and observers have been lately asserting this at least. The presidential Theodor Stolojan says so with a gritting of teeth-like irony repeating his new colleague Valeriu Stoica's statements on and on. Theodor Melescanu is also proving a same hypocrite blandness. What seems to be really pleasant is that everybody talks about the anticommunist discourse's decadence in a pretty relaxed way with funny faces taken from the comic register. This kind of postmodern relaxation must be a sign of a political health. Besides, this is how a large part of the Romanian press interprets this phenomenon looking upon those who oppose communism as really nice guys. The flowery words expressing the hope that Romania will get out of the post-communist way of thinking are however not missing. The new direction calls itself "pragmatics". It pledges to get rid of the symbolical debates that focus on the past, the rights and the freedom and listen to the ordinary man's voice instead. That means that it will be mainly interested in the economic trends' future status, an issue that can be tackled with a perfect blend of a gibberish talk and populism. Our pragmatic people are kind in a way: they admit that people can change, meaning the communists can turn into democrats. On the political level, they have no restraints willing to negotiate without considering either ideologies or biographies. Those who oppose the men who despise communism criticize the anti-Communists' intransigence, their claiming pathos and weakness and accuse them of willing to split up the society and turn it off from the real problems. The so-called anti-Communists' discourse is a reaction result a