If Milosevic lost, the Balkans would enter Europe. Will the Occident know how to administrate such challenge? While in Prague lots of organizations noisily protest against the globalization, which could be easily explained by the implacable logic of the market economy, at Belgrade, thousands of Serbs went out in the streets to celebrate in advance the victory of the democracy. The demonstrations these days in the two capitals of the former socialist camp, contradictory but accidentally simultaneous, have something in common however. Both of them claim to be the voice of an oppressed majority opposing a force that tries to act in spite of its will. Both of them express, more or less justifiably, the imperative of the deliverance. One of them wants to liberate from what the opponents of the globalization call the "money empire", represented by the rich states, the IMF, the World Bank or the WTO. The other wants to liberate from the dictatorship of hate and isolation embodied by the Milosevic regime. And this is all as for the analogies. As for the periods of time, the protests in the Czech capital represent the beginning of an answer. A brutal one, anarchic sometimes, incoherent and invalid in front of the challenge of a future about which nothing is said yet. Eventually, the globalization equally worries the prematurely called winner and the defeated. At Belgrade they celebrate, at the most, the late retrieval of a time. At Belgrade, the success of the democracy hardly starts confirming what in Prague the demonstrators seem to negate or at least to question. This is about the impossibility to oppose the crucial changes that the whole world has assisted to for the last years, changes generically called globalization. From this perspective, we could more usefully judge what actually represents our point of interest here, i.e. the historic majoritarian (by now) vote agai