If it accepted Vadim, Europe would legitimate any extremist regime or political party that would have the pretension in the future to come to power anywhere on the continent from Portugal to Bulgaria or Ukraine. The biggest mistake we could make waiting for and preparing the second round of the presidential elections is to hackney the reaction of the Occident towards the possibility that Vadim Tudor become the President of Romania. The source of the hackneying is the simple repetition, without stressing the deep reasons that determin Europe's reactions towards the extremist regimes, of the fact that Vadim President means "to distance or even to eliminate the EU and the NATO integration chances of the country", "Romania's isolation at a political and diplomatic level", and others. These truths, supported in a vague, diplomatic language risk to expose to a big part of the Romanian public the foreseeable reactions of the European Union or of the NATO members at Vadim's winning of the elections as some caprices of the present in the international relationships: democracy, human rights respected, good neighborhood relations and so on. Caprices that, eventually, could be ignored. Or, the situation is not exactly this one. What we should understand for real on the 10th of December is that the Occident would menace its most intimate principles, the basis on which the postbellum peace and the European integration were built, if it accepted inside (politically speaking), a semi-presidential republic with a President having fascist, extremist-nationalist, racist, anti-Semitic, anti-Hungarian, dictatorial habits. The European Union's and America's reaction towards the President Vadim will be perfectly assimilable to a defense conditioned response. The reflex started forming the hard way, when Great Britain and France tolerated the apparition of Adolf Hitler in Germany's van, the