In a country with a democratic system extremely fragile, as Romania is, the coming to power of an extremist leader might mean, just like it happened in Yugoslavia, the subordination of the democratic mechanisms, of the power and of the national symbolism to his maintaining to power. Let us suppose that, as a result of the elections on Sunday, December 10th, Corneliu Vadim Tudor become the President of Romania. What can we expect him to do after he installs at Cotroceni? There are two possibilities. The fiorst is the one of the "normal" president. Even Vadim Tudor should accept, in this scenario, the rules of the democratic game, imposed both at the intern and at the extern level by laws, common laws, economic and political pressures. At first sight, this is a pretty probable variant. Many of the people who voted him are convinced that the accusations of the type "Vadim will make war", either they refer to the Mafia or to the economy, are exaggerated. At a closer look, the exaggeration is not so big. The main reason is the huge contradiction between, the opposition in fact, between the PRM leader's discourse and promises and his political, constitutional, legal and even physical possibilities to fulfill at least part of these promises. Among others, the confiscation of the illegal estates in 48 hours, the Mafia's liquidation, the reopening of the factories and of the mines, the achieving of the "popular capitalism". The electorate that voted him would expect miracles of messianic respiration, promised by him, and their disappointment and angry will be directly proportional to the expectations that the extremist leader aroused. The avoidance of such a situation, in which his popularity will drastically diminish, should be an absolute priority for Vadim Tudor. But how could he avoid the electorate's clarifying on his own impotence to do economic and justice miracles? Un