Beyond Valeriu Stoica's talent to juggle among adversaries, friends or political competitors, PNL needs a serious talk about the direction to follow and the ideology to embrace. Two days only after PNTCD (National Christian and Democratic Peasant party) made a big step towards its rebirth, in PNL (National Liberal Party) a crisis seems to start. Horia Rusu, one of the most well known Valeriu Stoica's opponents, announces his intention to run for the position of president of the party. Horia Rusu motivates his gesture in an unequivocal way. There is, among the majority of the Liberals, a certain frame of mind "favoring a reconsideration of the political direction of the party", the Liberal leader affirms, accusing, at the same time, the current leadership of "oscillating and ambiguous" behavior. The resumption within the party of the public accusations directed towards Stoica's team, after a period when the prim vice-president's supremacy in the party seemed to be beyond doubt. The Congress to take place in ten days should only have sanctioned it, conferring him the presidential position. It's hard to believe it won't happen, but Horia Rusu's gesture is not at all meaningless. On the contrary. Concluding his motivation, Horia Rusu gets exactly to what could, in the future, represent the Liberals biggest problem. That is PNL's position on the political stage and its doctrinal coherence. Few are those who could reproach Valeriu Stoica lack of political intelligence and ability. His success in the local elections and, afterwards, even if not at the expected level for some, in the parliamentary elections, Theodor Stolojan's promoting (with significant results) as the party candidate for the presidential elections, all this is mostly due to him. But the future of the party is a different story and the first signals are not very convincing. Though it is the only Right wing