CNSAS cannot - no court can - emit legitimate judgments but when it is absolutely certain that they are based on complete, solid, irrefutable arguments and proofs. The only reason to exist of the National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives (CNSAS) is to repair a series of unjust things committed by an illegitimate regime against the members of a community, on the basis of some arbitrary and deeply unjust rules. The "reparations" are strictly moral ones, consisting in the identification of the ones who practiced the "political police". Without them, the intimate mechanisms of the former regime last in the future society, stopping it from replace it on the good way, the one that the freedom of the human reports suppose: in a normal, democratic society, there are no covered informers and political torturers. The "utility" function suggested above is made possible by the social deduction that the confrontation with the personal misery impose to a community, which thus "unburden", assuming its own past. Working with people with complicated destinies, CNSAS cannot play its part but paying attention to the details and the nuances, administrating also a substantial doze of piousness. This is exactly why it didn't do in the case of the former Hungarian Deputy, Ludovic Rakoczi. Several days before thee elections, his name appeared in the famous lists with "disclosed" people, in the category of the ones who "collaborated to the Securitate service but didn't practice political police". Without having been heard, he just saw his name in the list, published in the press. Rakoczi was immediately repudiated by UDMR (Democratic Union of the Hungarians in Romania), his party, and he could not run for a place in the Parliament any more. Meanwhile, Rakoczi laid down an appeal at CNSAS, which answered that "the probing material was reevaluated, establishing that your attitu