Marga seems to behave like the head of a revengeful camp which profits by the fact that its members have taken over the power within PNTCD (Peasants' National Christian Democratic Party) in order to find a warmer place on the future parliamentary lists. When the "people's" vote - according to Dudu Ionescu's phrase - turned Andrei Marga from an outsider into the PNTCD president, the hopes related to this party and the future of the Christian democracy in Romania increased as in front of a miraculous solution. Considered to be a high class intellectual coming from outside the traditional clans which competed within PNTCD and having a German philosophical background, Andrei Marga seemed to be the man who could transform the 2000 electoral defeat into an opportunity for re-inventing PNTCD as a modern party of a center-rightist orientation. He was supposed to multiply the legitimacy derived from PNTCD's opposition against communism by resorting to a new political offer which could combine pragmatism with solid doctrinarian principles. Why was Marga the person who should have done all these things? Mainly because of his generosity and tolerance towards the various opinions and interests that culture stimulates within a man. A certain human and intellectual generosity would have allowed Marga to be a mentor of his party and then to become its leader. I imagined that he was the man who could initiate an internal debate within PNTCD, focused on the strategic doctrinarian directions of the party: the PNTCD project for the Romanian village, the project meant to modernize the Romanian economy and administration, the globalization project and the external politics project. The party's branches should have been involved in this debate. The fact that nothing spectacular has happened within PNTCD so far may not mean that such a thing will never happen. Marga could try to know his pa