The accentuation of the political crisis in Romania right after the adherence didnât influence the sensational markets - the currency and stock exchange markets. Many voices noticed the lack of impact and the "dissociation" between the autochthonous politics and economics.
The previous political crisis in the countries that adhered to the EU in 2004 creates an elusory feeling. There, the economical processes continue to develop, investments are being made and, despite their fragility, the instruments of the liberal democracy work. However, this is an optimistic perspective of the situation. A more gradate perspective would examine changes in the collective psychology that result in certain political preferences, deviations to extremism, the weakening of the governments, harmful populism and so on. Also, an evaluation of the consequences of a probable deceleration of the economy processes based on the pressures of the globalization should be done as well.
A very important aspect has to be taken into consideration: the economy cannot develop on itself! It is useful even in the places where the private sector represents the main public political economic activities: it has to supply fundamental public goods necessary for the functioning of the private sector. The humanization of capitalism was done with the use of public political strategies. The long term paralyses lead to excesses, errors, block the public politics, which takes the economy in unwanted situations. There are such examples in mature economies in the Union, caused by the inability of certain governments to take the necessary reforming measures. For example, Luca Montezemolo, the FIAT boss, saw that there was a risk to hear the people speaking "about Italians, but not about Italy", due to the fact that the internal political strategy would create a negative country image.
There are char
