Right after the end of the NATO Summit in Bucharest, Ukraine replaced its ambassadors in Berlin and Moscow. According to the diplomatic code, the message is clear: Kiev didn’t agree with the German and Russian opposition towards its euro-Atlantic integration

Right after the end of the NATO Summit in Bucharest, Ukraine replaced its ambassadors in Berlin and Moscow. According to the diplomatic code, the message is clear: Kiev didn’t agree with the German and Russian opposition towards its euro-Atlantic integration and formulated an indirect reproach by placing the official responsibility on the back of its representatives that were supposed to take care of this problem and didn’t manage to.

Few people observed that this was also the fate of the Ukrainian ambassador in Bucharest. Even fewer were able to explain the gesture if we take into account the Romanian President’s support for the Ukrainian candidacy. A few days after the event, the Romanian ambassador in Kiev has been called by the Ukrainian Minister of External Affairs to explain a statement of President Basescu regarding the fact that the Souther Basarabia should get back to the Moldavian Republic. Even if this new statement of President Basescu was uninspired (it allows Chisinau to say Romania behaves like a suzerain power towards Moldova and Kiev to complain about an imaginary Romanian irredentism) the mistake would have been discreetly discussed upon in case of cordial bilateral relations. What is going on?!

The USA, together with Poland and the Baltic countries, have actively supported the national emancipation of Ukraine from under the Russian influence, the thing called the “orange revolution”, as well as the adherence process of Ukraine to NATO. Therefore, Ukraine’s failure at the NATO Summit in Bucharest was also an American, Polish and Baltic failure. If Ukraine