The Prime Minister with three names has begun stammering - he admitted that the capping of the compensation at 15% which he is proposing, creates an injustice, but that he had to choose between making justice and ... Romania itself.
Say what?!
So, "Romania" and "justice" are not the same thing?!
How can a prime minister make such a statement?
It seems to me that the "education" which was claimed to be one of his undisputable assets, is actually just on the surface.
How can you promote the distinction between "justice" and "Romania", while at the same time being "a man of culture"?!
What kind of prime minister is the one who doesn't realize that by making that statement, he clearly publicly invalidates one of the provisions of the Constitution - Article 1(3) "Romania is a lawful state"?!
As a prime minister, you can't just pass a draft law which you are aware is unjust, regardless of your reasons.
I won't deny that the difference between the State's ability to pay the compensations and the amount it actually has to pay could lead to disaster, I am denying the intellectual abilities of Ungureanu, because he is expressing the issue in these inadequate terms.
Without any qualms whatsoever.
Really, I'm panicking.
In fact, he has access to the details of the problem, but he did not treat them seriously, but only enough to allow him to act maliciously against his predecessors: following the code of manners, Mihai Răzvan Ungureanu "apologized" in the name and on behalf of the previous governments, which were unable to come up with a clear and definitive solution to this problem, due to what he called "political camouflage".
Yes, such elegant behavior, he is such a gentleman!
In fact, the "unjustness" of the compensation measures, was clear from the very start, when the State began the restitutions
