Fifty percent, plus one.

You can't add - "plus one" - to a statistical figure.

Statistical figures result from probabilistic calculations.

Probabilistic calculations lead to estimates, where errors are admissible.

The right to vote is inalienable, not estimative.

That is why, the number of citizens allowed to vote is not estimated, in the case of a ballot, but are instead counted one by one and registered with name, address and all the other information.

That is why the threshold is allowed to say "plus one", because that 50% is of the same nature - "one by one", rather than an amorphous bundle.

Would you like it if you lost your right to vote because you became part of the probabilistic margin for error?

It used to be simple: you got sentenced to jail, you went to jail; you plagiarized your PhD thesis, you lost your PhD; if the referendum didn't meet the requirements to be deemed valid, it would not be validated.

Now, it is not so easy anymore, you need to pick up the convicted person from the hospital, where he got (medical) asylum; the plagiarism is not plagiarism, because the commission which granted the PhD title did not acknowledge it; the Referendum which did not meet the validity requirements should be validated, because that's what the interim president and the USL want.

And I don't see why it shouldn't be possible, when every thing that was clear so far is now turned on all faces, dissected and redefined, to please the USL.

Hereinafter, I explain the legal procedures used for determining the number of eligible voters, without expecting that the USL "insurgents" will honor them.

I have to confess that, as I got together the information which this text is based on, I kept cursing, because I felt like I was one of those people who jump in the water, trying to get the rock thrown in by a ma