Counting the versions which result from the possible decision of the Constitutional Court is, in my opinion, pointless, because we are in the midst of a full moral hazard, where we are constantly redefining not only the notions, but the rules as well, meaning that the probability of the validation or the invalidation or the Referendum can not be calculated, and if it gets invalidated it is not certain that Băsescu would return to the Cotroceni, because we would be forced to understand the new notion of "Cotroceni" and to define the new notion of "Băsescu", let alone the new definition of "return", which will be quickly established by the Romanian Academy and the Official Gazette, assuming that we will by then know what "Academy" and "Monitor" even means, which of course isn't guaranteed at all.

I will however, draw up a synopsis of these options, to make it easier to evaluate the event which will happen tomorrow, but I will not include it in the body of the article, because in here, I will deal with things which are a bit more important than the issues of Antonescu, Ponta and Băsescu, which aren't my concern and I don't believe they should be yours either.

What seems more important to me is what one of the comments posted on the BURSA website:

"14.5. untitled (in reply to the opinion no. 14.4 / message sent by anonymous poster, on August 15th, 08.2012, 18:12)

Can there be that kind of well intentioned scrupulousness which could generate beneficial results, so as to counter the obviously evil efforts of the ill-intentioned opponent?"

Our reader concisely formulated a problem which (more or less explicitly) is frequently encountered at these times; the majority wants for Băsescu to go away, but some have their doubts over the methods used.

Part of the "anti-Băsescu" citizens unhesitatingly admit that the elimination operation is acco