Just when, disappointed again, I had published my conclusions on the "friendly polemic" concerning possible strategy for a turnaround of the capital market, readers that don't agree with my opinions joined the fight, in larger numbers and at an argumentation level which I would theoretically call "civilized".
Which has really made me happy, and made me ask the Editorial Office to publish the debate which occurred in the comments posted on the BURSA website in today's printed issue and to create this new episode, in which I answer those comments, called "Terminus post quem" - a Latin expression meaning "limit after which ...", meaning, the origin of what follows.
The debate in the comments section was more coherent than it was on other occasions, and late in the evening, at 20:46, shifted into a different note, through the intervention of the man calling himself "The Prazilian" (the poster may have opted for this nickname, under the impression left by the Romanian humorous phrase "so long and don't forget your leek", (ed: note:praz=leek in Romanian), which I had used after speaking about the expected confiscation of the savings in the banking system prepared by the European Union, as a last resort measure, which makes me suspect that the "Prazilian" is a banker, but I am not trying to figure out his or her identity).
At 23:09, an anonymous poster had the remarkable idea that we are not tapping the potential of our regulated market - the BSE -, and said that we should focus on improving it, and the "Prazilian" returned at 1:00 and at la 1:14, even though the day had ended and the articles of the new issue had replaced the ones from the previous day.
They were left unanswered.
I will now respond first to the "anonymous" poster and then to the "Prazilian".
This order serves my purpose - the response to the "anonymous" poster includes r
