2000 may bring to our sight results much more spectacular than the fact that PDSR (the Party for Social Democracy in Romania) will win the elections by an overwhelming majority "Just a miracle may make PDSR not win the general elections this year". This is the most of the Romanian analysts' conclusion who have recently taken part in a debate organized by the Liberal Study Institute, an organization founded by the Liberals. It rarely happens in the history of a democracy that an electoral fight should be cut off into pieces like that long before the moment when its official results are to come into public attention. For almost a year, the diagram of the electoral percentages has been looking hideous and threatening. An endless chain of potential votes for a single party, PDSR, side by side with a lot of political "dwarfs", starting with CDR (the Democrat Coalition in Romania), ApR (the Alliance for Romania) etc. In the party systems' theory, such a situation on the point of being confirmed through elections is a completely aberration. It doesn't include in any typology at all. We are actually facing a system completely unbalanced in which a single party finds itself in the potentially situation to dictate any political arrangements behind the actual elections. A Party quasi-monopoly as it is. This is happening in Romania after ten years of democratic exercise. Nowhere in the Central and Eastern Europe, excepting the CSI region, such things can happen. More weird and maybe more seriously, is the fact that this quasi-monopoly might be put into force by a party that was on power long enough. In other words, we can't talk even about a novelty or a so-called system revolutionizing when a "genuine" political force capitalizes the need of a profound change of the society. It's about a restoration, which through its raw data, namely the electoral percentages, tends to give ba