If Premier Adrian Nastase's objections against the activity of CNSAS are puerile, the reasons for the change of the law of functioning are completely false. Is CNSAS (National Council for the Study of the Securitate Archives) still useful or not? Such a question, after half a year of functioning of the College, appears to be at least abnormal. And yet, this is what Romania's Premier thinks. Therefore, not only Romania is the last of the former communist states of Eastern Europe that adopted a law on the access of the Securitate files, but it also becomes the first to doubt its utility. Nastase knows very well why he commits an interpretation offence. Even if the CNSAS achievements were under the expectances, they are only the effect of a law bad cut. The imperfections found by now in the functioning of this institution should not normally represent reasons to deny the reasons it exists for, just like the ineffectiveness of justice in a generalized corruption cannot be a pretext to abolish this institution. And it cannot be a reason to place under an interrogation mark the intentions and the curative role it plays in society, expected by the application of the law. A series of pseudo-reasons are invoked in the Premier's pleading. CNSAS swallows too much money. The few tenths of billion lei that the functioning of the College suppose annually represent nothing comparing to the effects of the latest economic measures. For instance, recently, the Government established that the IAS' debts estimated to more than a billion dollars be passed in the public debt. No taxpayer was asked whether those debts were too expensive for his pocket, nor did the Premier notice how burdening these debts were for the budget. In exchange, a debt several thousand smaller becomes all of a sudden expensive. The current law, the mildest possible, is far from being a law of lustration. Nobody wi