What President Ion Iliescu and King Mihai I of Romania would tell each other? After Easter, history promised itself to play a little. King Mihai I consented to have a meeting with President Ion Iliescu, at the latter's proposition. In December 1947, the same king was forced to leave his country that became the communists' property. He was leaving together with the last hopes of a democratic regime. One year after the king abdicated, Iliescu was joining the first Central Committee of the Union of Pupils' Associations in Romania and two years later he was leaving for Moscow, proving to be, at his return, a sedulous agent of Romania's communization. The king was going to a hurtful exile. For forty years, one of them was felling like the fish in the water in the middle of the most diabolic barbarousness directed against people, the other watched it all with pain, sending messages of helplessness when possible. What should the public understand of the current state of facts? How do Romanians see this encounter? A month ago, more than 20% of the ones who were asked how they see the King' s first answer said the King's gesture might be interpreted as an "non-permissible impoliteness". Watch it! One fifth of the Romanians. About as many as the ones who thought Iliescu was not right inviting the former sovereign. The first two categories could be framed well into the group of those who learned well a communist history lesson, even more false and ideologized as the aversion in their attitude is bigger. Half of the interviewed people stated President Iliescu did well when he thought to make this invitation. It was less commented which were the reasons that urged the presidential staff to make such a gesture. It was only the initiative of the team of councilors, meant to promote a new presidential image? Or the President really regrets his past, or at least portions of it? Until