The Hungarian population needs permanent political expression, no matter who might be ruling and what political color they might have, the contesting of the PDSR-UDMR pact representing a political blunder. It was proven that of the three parties in the "democratic opposition", with which PDSR (Social Democracy Party) signed or tried to sign a protocol, UDMR (Democratic Union of the Hungarians in Romania) is the most faithful and correct partner of PDSR, if we watch through the prism of the agreements signed. When the Sate budget for 2001 was voted, this fact was not only clearly seen, but the stakes this relationship involves for the rule between 2000 and 2004 were also underlined, for the first time, at their real quota: no matter what the attitude of PRM might be, if the relationship with UDMR functions, the Nastase Cabinet has the parliamentary majority ensured in this rule. The implications for PNL (National Liberal Party) and PD (democratic Party) are immediate: the power to negotiate of these political parties comparing to PDSR and the Government, which can be verified especially when it is about very sensitive laws, tends to be null. Nastase's reaction to the propositions of the parliamentary groups of PNL to break the protocol with PNL is a good measure of the fear of PDSR in front of PNL: "I am glad you have proposed that eh protocol be cancelled, as I have to admit we had difficulties to sustain this protocol in front of my colleagues and the electorate". Unfortunately, the PD and PNL reaction against the force rapport was to find UDMR as the main guilty part for their own impossibility to vote and for the inconsistency of arguments. In reality by the existence of a special relationship of UDMR with the power, presently the PDSR power, the government tacitly accepts the moderate modernizing propositions of UDMR, necessary anyway, the public scandal is avoid