It's easy to laugh about what happens to Greater Romania Party head Corneliu Vadim Tudor. He's getting what he deserves. His party looks like a big truck loaded in the wrong way. All falls off that isn't firmly fastened in place. At every bump on the road, jerky movement or attempt made by some self-interested individual one more piece disappears from this incoherent political construction. What should we do if half of the Greater Romania Party (PRM) goes to blazes? Should we keep on laughing? In my opinion, we can't let things slide

It's easy to laugh about what happens to Greater Romania Party head Corneliu Vadim Tudor. He's getting what he deserves. His party looks like a big truck loaded in the wrong way. All falls off that isn't firmly fastened in place. At every bump on the road, jerky movement or attempt made by some self-interested individual one more piece disappears from this incoherent political construction. What should we do if half of the Greater Romania Party (PRM) goes to blazes? Should we keep on laughing? In my opinion, we can't let things slide. No matter how much Vadim deserves that and no matter how good the thinning of a party such as PRM may look, we can't overlook the implications of the move. I mean the migration of MPs after having been elected by voters. It's not the first time when such a phenomenon occurs. It also happened in the previous legislatures. I think that in times of trouble, the same migration could occur in other parties, including the ruling party PSD which at present is in a great shape swallowing little fish from its rivals. The sure thing is the voters' will is bent by behind-the-stage debates. The second extremely important issue has to do with the condition of the ruling party itself. Does it have the moral right to take in anybody anyhow? My opinion is that the "swallowing" of MPs in bulk doesn't bring too many adv