One could comfortably choose between Isarescu and Stolojan, but if you have to oppose PDSR for it, you realize that the option between the two actually confuses you. We read the polls, one after another, and we cannot believe our eyes. PDSR has largely dominated in popularity the Romanian political spectrum for over a year. The other four political parties worth attention partake of the leavings as the dogs at the master's meal, like in the biblical parable. Ion Iliescu is recovering from the recoil registered lately when the two former technocrats, Isarescu and Stolojan, launched in the electoral campaign, and he is now reaching the top in potential votes number, where he seems to be invincible. The metabolism of a healthy democracy supposes, besides the conjunctures, a certain equilibrium of the options. The science of the party systems does not recognize as democratic a political arrangement in which, as it happens in our case if the current situation is validated by vote, one single political party dictates the rules of power. With almost half the options of the electorate and with no counterweight, it is very likely that PDSR establish after the elections an absolutely valid dictatorship. Do we really run such a risk? Will Iliescu and PDSR become the quasi-absolute masters of Romania for a period of time? Do the polls reflect a real situation? If so, what are the chances of the political parties and of their presidential candidates that are now on the other side to re-equilibrate a system that tends to become hegemonic? The most probable answer is that the danger exists, the situation that the polls reveal is real, but this is not fatal too. The counterweight for PDSR exists but it does not manifest itself yet in a coherent formula though the chances to defeat Iliescu are even bigger than they seem now. PDSR's domination in the polls cannot be denied. PDSR is, a