The traditional Romanian trick has unsuspected resources. We admit the right to property in general, but we hinder the owners to exert this right for real, be it about houses, lands or woods. A few weeks ago, high officials of PDSR (Social Democracy Party) were talking about the intention to modify the Law Lupu, in order to make it easier to apply. Last Friday the Premier gave some details regarding the manner in which the law would be "improved". An improvement that makes us think about one of the jokes in the series Radio Erevan, something like that: "We make a correction as for the news transmitted yesterday regarding Ivan Ivanovici, that he would have won a car; it was not a car, it was a watch, and he was not given, he was taken it". Thus, for the establishment of the property right on woods the witness proof will not be taken into consideration any more, a fact that eliminated from the start a lot of individuals that were justified, to which Securitate confiscated proving documents, and those whose requests are yet fulfilled are obliged to give the wood in the State's exploitation. Under these circumstances, it is hard to see what remains of the property right, in real terms. Especially that we have in mind the experience of the ones who held stocks at the IAS (Agriculture State Enterprises), which for most of the people resulted in almost nothing. The laws related to property fundamentally express the political options of those who promote them. In this category are included both the ones related to the returning of the lands or woods, as well as for the nationalized houses. The general conception on the manner in which the privatization for the State enterprise is to be done could be included here too. For instance, the influential political circles in PDSR and PRM think that the privatization of the State enterprises should be done imposing severe conditions